Company profile · 3 min read
Conveo turns AI-moderated interviews into a compounding consumer-understanding layer
Conveo runs voice and video research, recurring programmes and deep-dive studies that become a queryable knowledge base for product and marketing teams.
Cofounder of Lazyweb (a16z Speedrun). Previously grew subscriptions and built native ads at Duolingo. Writes First1000 (90,000+ subscribers).
Published · Updated
Conveo is for teams that need qualitative customer understanding continuously, not only a survey or focus group at the end of a launch cycle. It combines AI-moderated voice and video interviews with research expertise, analysis and a knowledge layer that compounds across studies.
What it does
Conveo’s current site describes always-on research programmes, focused deep dives and a queryable understanding layer. Teams can run usage-and-attitudes work, ethnography, jobs-to-be-done, brand research, concept and packaging tests, UX studies, shopper journeys, MaxDiff and pricing methods. Conveo homepage
The advantage over a one-off AI interview tool is continuity. Conveo says every interview strengthens the organization’s knowledge base, so a new question can build on prior work rather than starting recruitment, moderation and synthesis from scratch. The platform also pairs research methods with stakeholder-ready reports, slides and quote reels, which matters when insight must change a product or marketing decision.
The public product claims enterprise controls including ISO 27701, ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, single sign-on and granular access controls. Those are company statements; no security or privacy review was performed. The buyer should ask how participant consent, recordings, transcripts, panel provenance and data retention are handled in each market.
Conveo’s product is broader than an AI-only shortcut, which is both strength and cost consideration. The public sources do not list standard pricing. A research leader should scope the mix of always-on programmes, interviews, markets, methods and human research support before comparing it to a survey platform or a traditional agency.
The YC profile identifies Dieter De Mesmaeker as a technical founder and Hendrik Van Hove as a former McKinsey technology/AI and private-equity operator with finance training. That context supports the blend of research and software; it does not independently validate the findings produced by a study.
My editorial take
I would shortlist Conveo for a multi-market brand or product organization that keeps repeating the same customer questions and wants the answers to accumulate. Start with one live research programme and compare decision time and insight reuse against the current agency or panel process. For a single low-stakes question, a simpler interview tool may be more economical.
Quick facts
| Field | Sourced detail |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Consumer insights, product, marketing and research teams |
| Product | AI-moderated interviews, research methods and a knowledge layer |
| Methods named | Ethnography, JTBD, concept, UX, shopper, MaxDiff and pricing research |
| Pricing | Enterprise/demo-led; no standard public price found |
| Main fit question | Will repeated research compound into better decisions, not just more transcripts? |
Sources checked
Conveo’s YC profile, homepage and public pricing-method material were checked on 2026-09-19.
Cohort context
Conveo is listed in Summer 2024. In our 2026-09-18 directory snapshot, 161 of 248 listed companies in that cohort have YC’s primary industry label B2B (64.9%). This is a current-directory comparison, not an original intake count or a performance ranking. Nine-cohort dataset.
Public website snapshot
Observed 2026-09-19T16:16:58.221Z in raw homepage HTML. This records visible metadata and advertised links, not agent execution or product quality.
| Signal | Homepage observation |
|---|---|
| Product description metadata | Observed |
| Canonical link | Observed |
| H1 or H2 heading | Observed |
| Typed structured data | Observed |
| Docs/developer link | Observed |
| Pricing link | Observed |
| llms.txt link | Not observed in this response |
| Markdown alternate | Not observed in this response |
Public observations · Collection method. Missing links here do not establish that a capability or file is absent elsewhere.
About the author
Cofounder of Lazyweb (a16z Speedrun). Previously grew subscriptions and built native ads at Duolingo. Writes First1000 (90,000+ subscribers).
I cofound Lazyweb and publish Mudpie. This is an owner-written publication, not an independent testing organization. Research notes distinguish observations, sourced reporting and editorial judgment.
First1000 ↗ · X ↗