mudpie

Company profile · 3 min read

Codes Health: Medical records from client intake to settlement-ready evidence

Codes Health retrieves, verifies and summarizes medical records, bills and imaging for plaintiff law firms across a public 50-state workflow.

Published · Updated

Codes Health retrieves, checks and summarizes medical records for plaintiff law firms. It fits a personal-injury practice that loses settlement speed to rejected requests, missing providers, fax follow-up and medical timelines assembled by hand.

What it does

Codes Health’s current site describes a workflow from client intake to settlement-ready case: validate the request, locate care sites, retrieve medical, billing, imaging and affidavit records, then produce chronologies and case insights. It says retrieval uses AI plus human intervention, with status updates for every fax and call and automated checking to reduce preventable provider rejections.

The product is not just a document summarizer. Its value sits earlier in the process, where the firm needs complete records and a clear view of diagnoses, treatment, future expenses and missing evidence before negotiating. The page says coverage spans all 50 states and lists claims integrations, custodian integrations and a proprietary provider network.

Public pricing is not listed. The homepage reports a one-to-two-week average turnaround and company case claims including 80% less manual review, 2.5x faster retrieval, 50% more case capacity and larger settlements. Those are vendor or customer claims, not independent measurements. A firm should run one matter through intake, retrieval, gap detection and chronology before trusting the topline numbers.

Founder context and tradeoffs

The YC profile identifies Cody Durr and Austin Mills as founders but provides limited professional background beyond their roles. The company publishes a HIPAA-compliant positioning, encryption, access controls, audit trails, no-training data policy, BAAs and third-party testing claims. These should be verified in the firm’s own legal and security review.

The key tradeoff is speed versus evidence confidence. AI can surface a missing record or summarize a file, but the firm still needs to know what was requested, what arrived, what remains missing and which human verified the insight. Codes says the workflow includes human intervention, which is a useful boundary for a legal case record.

Editorial take

I would shortlist Codes Health for a plaintiff firm with enough case volume to measure retrieval time and missing-record rate. Start with one case type and compare a complete record package against the firm’s current process. The product earns its place when it helps the lawyer reach a case decision sooner, not merely when it produces a shorter summary.

Quick facts

Field Sourced detail
Product Medical-record retrieval, verification, chronologies and case insights
Buyers Plaintiff personal-injury law firms and healthcare/legal teams
Coverage Homepage says nationwide 50-state retrieval
Public claims 1–2 week turnaround and operational outcomes, company-reported
Pricing Not publicly listed

Sources checked

Source Checked
YC profile 2026-09-19
Codes Health homepage 2026-09-19
Codes Health blog 2026-09-19

Cohort context

Codes Health is listed in Summer 2024. In our 2026-09-18 directory snapshot, 161 of 248 listed companies in that cohort have YC’s primary industry label B2B (64.9%). This is a current-directory comparison, not an original intake count or a performance ranking. Nine-cohort dataset.

Public website snapshot

Observed 2026-09-19T16:16:57.108Z in raw homepage HTML. This records visible metadata and advertised links, not agent execution or product quality.

Signal Homepage observation
Product description metadata Observed
Canonical link Observed
H1 or H2 heading Observed
Typed structured data Not observed in this response
Docs/developer link Not observed in this response
Pricing link Not observed in this response
llms.txt link Not observed in this response
Markdown alternate Not observed in this response

Public observations · Collection method. Missing links here do not establish that a capability or file is absent elsewhere.

About the author

I cofound Lazyweb and publish Mudpie. This is an owner-written publication, not an independent testing organization. Research notes distinguish observations, sourced reporting and editorial judgment.

First1000 ↗ · X ↗